Thursday, March 19, 2020

Censorship in AMerica essays

Censorship in AMerica essays Marilyn Manson, The Beatles, NWA, Garth Brooks, and the king, Elvis, What do all these people have in common? Well, yes, they are all musical groups, but there is something more. Marilyn Manson is a heavy metal group who worships Satan, the Beatles were one of the greatest Rock N Roll bands of all time, and NWA was a hard-core rap group from the 80s. Garth Brooks is a country singer and greatest selling performer of all time, and well, Elvis is the king of Rock N Roll. So what do they all have in common? All of these artists have or had songs with indecent or obscene lyrics. Since the dawn of musical expression, there have been people trying to stop or hinder the constitutional right to listen and enjoy music of all forms. There were ordinary, everyday people during the infancy of Rock N Roll in the 1960s who made it their mission in life to stop so-called obscene music like the Beatles song Lucy In the Sky With Diamonds, from polluting our airwaves and minds. These groups succeeded in banning some songs from the radio, but most of their actions were for naught, because there was no real punishment for radio stations playing those songs labeled obscene. By 1985, many people wanted to cleanse the music industry of its indecent music, so the most prominent group in the history of music censorship was started: The Parents Music Resource Center (PMRC)-(A Brief...). This was just the first of many groups who made it their business to decide what the American Population These censorship groups have also been able to get government money in order to fight, lie, and bribe their way to censoring music. The PMRC and other organizations have also convinced government organizations like the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) to regulate what music is played on the radio. Places like Target, Disc Joc...

Monday, March 2, 2020

Quotations with Colons

Quotations with Colons Quotations with Colons Quotations with Colons By Mark Nichol Colons frequently crop up as transitional punctuation preceding a quotation, but that particular punctuation mark is usually not a good choice, as explained in the discussions that follow the sentences below; a revision follows each discussion. 1. The graffiti included the words: â€Å"Black lives matter.† This simple declarative statement requires no punctuation between the descriptive opening phrase and the quotation: â€Å"The graffiti included the words ‘Black lives matter.’† (There is an unlikely exception: The words have been previously alluded to, and now they are being explicitly stated. In that case, the colon is appropriate.) 2. Smith planned to head to the region immediately and promised people in the area: â€Å"No individual, no family, no community will be left behind.† In journalism, a colon is often used to signal that a quotation is about to follow an attribution, but a comma is much more appropriate, because whereas colons generally punctuate with the halting force of a period, a comma is more smoothly transitional: â€Å"Smith planned to head to the region later Wednesday and promised people in the area, ‘No individual, no family, no community will be left behind.’† (If the attribution constitutes a complete thought, a colon is correct, as in this revision: â€Å"Smith planned to head to the region later Wednesday, and his promise to the people in the area was emphatic: ‘No individual, no family, no community will be left behind.’†) 3. The question is: â€Å"How did the outcome of World War I contribute to the advent of World War II?† This sentence presumably refers to a written question on an examination of some kind, as in a high school history test, but whether it is a quotation or simply part of a narrative, a colon is obstructive (as explained in the previous item), and, just as a comma generally follows an attribution (such as â€Å"she said†) that introduces a quotation- again, see above- a comma is appropriate to separate the setup phrase here and the quotation: â€Å"The question is, ‘How did the outcome of World War I contribute to the advent of World War II?’† (If the question is merely posed in a narrative, rather than a reproduction of a written question, the quotation marks- and the capitalization of the first word- aren’t necessary: â€Å"The question is, how did the outcome of World War I contribute to the advent of World War II?† Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Punctuation category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Creative Writing 101Empathy "With" or Empathy "For"?Apostrophe with Plural Possessive Nouns